Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/672/2025 of YASHODA DEVI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 672 of 2025 1.Yashoda Devi, aged about 36 years, W/O- Mahavir Saw, 2.Mahavir Saw, aged about 44 years, S/O – Bakhori Saw, 3.Shankar Saw, aged about 40 years, S/O- Bakhori Saw, all resident of village- Deokuli, P.O.-
2026:JHHC:29082
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 672 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Yashoda Devi, aged about 36 years, W/O- Mahavir Saw,
2. Mahavir Saw, aged about 44 years, S/O – Bakhori Saw,
3. Shankar Saw, aged about 40 years, S/O- Bakhori Saw, all resident of village- Deokuli, P.O.- Ichak P.S.- Ichak, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand
…....... Appellant(s)
Vrs.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Girja Devi, W/O, W/O- Vinay Paswan, resident of village- Deokulli, P.O.+P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand
........ Respondent(s)
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s)
: Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. For the Resp. No.2
: Ms. Pragati Prasad, Advocate
10/28.09.2026 The present criminal appeal has been preferred against the order dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Hazaribagh rejecting the prayer of anticipatory bail of the appellants in A.B.P No. 1203 of 2025 in connection with SC/ST Case No. 05 of 2025 arising out of Ichak P.S. Case No. 220 of 2023. The case is now pending before the Cout of learned Special Judge, SC/ST, Hazaribag.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the other side have not raised any objection.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 23 .09.2026 A. Mohanty
Uploaded ____/____/2026