Jharkhand High Court

WPC/6520/2024 of KAUSHAR ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY, on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6520 of 2024 --------- Kaushar Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Md. Intaj Ansari, resident of village-Champapur, P.O.-Chainpur P.S.-Narayanpur, District-Jamtara, Jharkhand. ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary,

2026:JHHC:29104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (S) No. 6520 of 2024

---------

Kaushar Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Md. Intaj Ansari, resident of village-Champapur, P.O.-Chainpur P.S.-Narayanpur, District-Jamtara, Jharkhand.

......Petitioner(s)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.

2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.Ο. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

4. The District Education Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

.....Respondent(s)

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogendra Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to S.C.(L&C)-II

--------- 04/Dated:-28.09.2026

1. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to approach the Respondent Authorities, if so advised.

2. There is no objection from the respondents.

3. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.

(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08/10/2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead