Jharkhand High Court

Cr.Rev./411/2024 of MD IFTEKHAR ALIAS MD IFTAKAR ALIAS IFTAKAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ANTI CORRUPTION BUREARU A C B on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 411 of 2024 Md. Iftekhar @ Md. Iftakar @ Iftakar, aged about 44 years, son of Md. Izhar, resident of R.D.D.E. Office Dumka, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

( 2026:JHHC:29174 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Criminal Revision No. 411 of 2024

Md. Iftekhar @ Md. Iftakar @ Iftakar, aged about 44 years, son of Md. Izhar, resident of R.D.D.E. Office Dumka, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand through Anti Courruption Bureau (A.C.B.)

… … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate

: Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl. P.P.

---

05/28.09.2026

This Cr. Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 05.01.2024 passed by learned Special Judge (ACB), Dumka in Vigilance Case No. 03 of 2021 arising out of Dumka (A.C.B.) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2020, whereby the learned Court has dismissed the discharge petitioner preferred by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the parties are present.

3. Learned counsel for the A.C.B., at the threshold has informed this Court that the Trial has commenced and witnesses are being examined before the Court. He submits that the stage has changed.

4. At this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this Criminal Revision Application at this stage. However, an observation may be made that dismissal of the Revision will not prejudice the case of either of the parties.

5. Considering the submissions, this Revision is disposed of without entering into the merits of the case. It is observed that this order will not prejudice the case of either party at the stage of trial.

6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading:

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead