Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9007/2026 of SHUBHAM KUMAR MANDAL @ SHUBHAM KUMAR MONDAL Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9007 of 2026 Shubham Kumar Mandal @ Shubham Kumar Mondal, aged about 28 years, S/o Chote Lal Mandal, R/o- Karamtoli, Morabadi, P.O.-G.P.O.- P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29118 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9007 of 2026
Shubham Kumar Mandal @ Shubham Kumar Mondal, aged about 28 years, S/o Chote Lal Mandal, R/o- Karamtoli, Morabadi, P.O.-G.P.O.- P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
02/28.09.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
2. Learned counsel for the Opposite-Party-State Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned A.P.P. also present.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2026 in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 176 of 2026, registered under Section 292, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, now pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Ranchi.
4. Upon a query of this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge-sheet has not been submitted so far. Investigation is going on.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that at the stage of investigation, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. There are serious allegations against the petitioner.
6. Considering the fact that investigation is going on and there are serious allegations against the petitioner and there is a likelihood that the petitioner may temper to the evidence, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail ( 2026:JHHC:29118 )
2
of the petitioner is rejected.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: