Jharkhand High Court

B.A./8203/2026 of MOHNISH RAZA @ GUDDU Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8203 of 2026 Mohnish Raza @ Gudda, aged about 22 years, S/o Md. Mokrram Ansari @ Akram Ansari, resident of village Dhegura, P.O. & P.S. Katkamdag, District Hazaribag … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …

2026:JHHC:29076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 8203 of 2026

Mohnish Raza @ Gudda, aged about 22 years, S/o Md. Mokrram Ansari @ Akram Ansari, resident of village Dhegura, P.O. & P.S. Katkamdag, District Hazaribag

…

…

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

…

… Opp. Party

---

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Ayush Kumar Singh, Advocate

For the Opp. Party

: Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Advocate

For the Informant

: Mr. Gautam Kr. Pandey, Advocate

---

07/28th September 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 72/2026 for the offence registered under Section 126(2), 115(2), 69 & 351(2) of BNS, said to have been pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2026 and the cognizance has been taken for alleged offence under Sections 69, 351(2) of BNS against the petitioner. The victim is major and it is alleged that the petitioner and the victim were known to each other and on the false pretext of marriage, the petitioner established physical relationship with the victim and subsequently refused to marry her. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. No video etc. has been recovered. The petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned counsel for the State as well as the Informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, it appears that the petitioner and the victim were known to each other and the victim has

2026:JHHC:29076

stated that she used to like the petitioner, who established physical relationship with her and ultimately refused to marry her.

5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 72/2026, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

(vi) The petitioner shall not disturb the victim or her family members in any manner whatsoever. In the event of any such occurrence of disturbance, it shall be open to the victim or her family members party to move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner before the concerned court.

6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

Dated: 28.09.2026

Uploaded On: 30.09.2026

Mukul/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead