Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/860/2026 of SAKENDRA GUPTA ALIAS SATYENDRA KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 860 of 2026 ------ 1. Sakendra Gupta @ Satyendra Kumar, age 31 years old, 2. Mahendra Gupta @ Mahendra Kumar Gupta, age 34 years old Both are son of Nepali Sah, resident of Village Tahde, P.O. & P.S., Manjhiaon,
( 2026:JHHC:29068 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 860 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sakendra Gupta @ Satyendra Kumar, age 31 years old,
2. Mahendra Gupta @ Mahendra Kumar Gupta, age 34 years old Both are son of Nepali Sah, resident of Village Tahde, P.O. & P.S., Manjhiaon, District Garhwa. .... .... …. Appellant(s)
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Shrawan Paswan, son of Late Vriksh Paswan, resident of Village Tahde, P.O. & P.S., Manjhiaon, District Garhwa.
.... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P.
------
Order No.03/Dated : 28.09.2026
1. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 03.07.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA) Act-cum- Additional Sessions Judge-I, Garhwa in connection with Manjhiaon P.S. Case No. 40 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST(PoA) Act-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-I, Garhwa.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal.
3. Learned counsels for the other sides have raised no objection.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 28.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 29.09.2026