Jharkhand High Court

WPC/454/2025 of NIMAI CHANDRA BAURI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, PRIMARY EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, RANCHI, on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 454 of 2025 --------- Nimai Chandra Bauri aged about 52 years son of Bhairav Bauri Resident of Village - Gundri, P.O. - Rangamatiya, P.S. - Chandankiayari, District - Bokaro ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary,

2026:JHHC:29045

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (S) No. 454 of 2025

---------

Nimai Chandra Bauri aged about 52 years son of Bhairav Bauri Resident of Village - Gundri, P.O. - Rangamatiya, P.S. - Chandankiayari, District - Bokaro

......Petitioner(s)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S. - Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi

2. The Secretary, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S. - Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi

3. The Director, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, P.O. - Dhurwa, P.S. - Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District - Bokaro

5. The District, Superintendent of Education, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. - Bokaro, District - Bokaro

.....Respondent(s)

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to S.C.-V

--------- 03/Dated:-28.09.2026

1. After some arguments, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the Director, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi (Respondent No.3).

2. There is no objection from the Respondents though a counter affidavit has been filed in this case.

3. Having regard to the above, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.

4. It goes without saying that if the Petitioner will approach the concerned Respondent; his representation may be disposed of in accordance with law.

5. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.

(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08/10/2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead