Jharkhand High Court
WPC/6132/2024 of ANIL PRASAD VERMA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6132 of 2024 --------- Anil Prasad Verma, aged about 44 years, son of Hriday Narayan Verma, resident of village-Bhandaro, P.O. & P.S.-Sarwan, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary,
2026:JHHC:29088
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 6132 of 2024
---------
Anil Prasad Verma, aged about 44 years, son of Hriday Narayan Verma, resident of village-Bhandaro, P.O. & P.S.-Sarwan, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand.
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Dumka, P.Ο. & P.S. - Dumka, District
- Dumka.
4. The District Education Officer, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. - Dumka, District - Dumka.
5. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. - Dumka, District - Dumka.
.....Respondent(s)
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogendra Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to AAG-III
--------- 05/Dated:-28.09.2026
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant application may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent No.2 in order to redress his grievance.
2. There is no objection from the respondents.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08/10/2026