Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9071/2026 of VIJAY SINGH @ BIJAY SINGH Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9071 of 2026 ------ Vijay Singh @ Bijay Singh, aged about 35 years, Son of – Om Prakash, Resident of Village- Bhojpur Narayanpur, Post Office- Kakrala, Police Station- Kadar Chowk, District- Budaun, State Uttar Pradesh. .... ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29028] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9071 of 2026
------ Vijay Singh @ Bijay Singh, aged about 35 years, Son of – Om Prakash, Resident of Village- Bhojpur Narayanpur, Post Office- Kakrala, Police Station- Kadar Chowk, District- Budaun, State Uttar Pradesh.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-28-02-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No. 144 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 334(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft in the jewellery shop and took away gold and silver jewelleries. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the self-confessional statement made in connection with Suti P.S. Jangipur (Murshidabad) W.B. Case No. 1376 of 2025. It is also submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.07.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.09.2026 passed in B.A. No.8767 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No. 144 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 28.09.2026
Amar/