B.A./7111/2026 of SAMAD ANSARI @ SAHMAT ANSARI @ SAMAD Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026

2026:JHHC:29119

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 7111 of 2026

Samad Ansari @ Sahmat Ansari @ Samad, aged about 20 years, S/O- Kasim Miyan, R/O Village- Alagchuwan, P.O.+P.S.- Karmatanr, District- Jamtara.

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P.

---

05/28.09.2026

Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2025 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 corresponding to Cyber Case No. 70 of 2025, registered under Sections 111(2)(ii), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66B, 66C & 66D of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara.

3. The affidavit of the Inspector-cum-Officer in-charge at Jamtara P.S., District- Jamtara who has been authorized by the Superintendent of Police, Jamtara to file an affidavit before this Court, has been filed during the court proceedings, which is taken on record. It reveals that after the last rejection order on 01.05.2026 in B.A. No. 3438 of 2026, one witness was examined on 05.06.2026 and thereafter, a few witnesses were examined on 03.09.2026.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2025. He submits that 5 mobile phones with SIMs are alleged to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner, out of which 03 are in the name of other persons. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and 09 out of 15 witnesses have been examined. He submits that identically placed co- accused have been enlarged on bail.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that there is no

2026:JHHC:29119

2

likelihood of tampering any of the witnesses. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.

7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 03.04.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 corresponding to Cyber Case No. 70 of 2025, on the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.

8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026