B.A./9041/2026 of ASLEN BASKI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026

( 2026:JHHC:29167 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9041 of 2026

Aslen Baski, aged about 56 years, wife of Dasu Tudu, resident of village Bohra, P.O. Padarkola, P.S. Amrapara, District Pakur, Jharkhand

… … Petitioner

Versus

The state of Jharkhand …

… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Ms. Amrita Kumari, APP

---

03/28.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No. 23 of 2021, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 120B, 323, 307, 354B, 379,380,436,456,500,506,509 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the allegation is serious but there is general and omnibus allegation and it is alleged the petitioner was present at the place of occurrence and therefore his name has come in the FIR. The learned counsel submits that numerous persons who are similarly situated have been enlarged on bail and some of them have also been enlarged on anticipatory bail by different orders passed by this court.

4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are serious allegations and therefore the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. However, the fact that other similarly situated persons have been enlarged on bail by different Benches of this court is not in dispute.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact there are 59 accused persons named in the FIR, but no specific role has been assigned to the petitioner and the allegations are general and omnibus and also that numerous similarly situated persons have been enlarged on bail by different Benches of this court; the charge sheet having already been submitted, the

( 2026:JHHC:29167 ) 2

petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No. 23 of 2021, on the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will not disturb the victim in any manner whatsoever.

(iv) The petitioner will attend the court personally on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.

7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 28.09.2026 Uploaded on 30.09.2026 Binit/