Jharkhand High Court
B.A./6917/2026 of SURESH KHARIYA ALIAS GHOGHA KHARIYA @ SURESH KHARIA @ GHONGHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6917 of 2026 Suresh Khariya @ Ghogha Khariya @ Suresh Kharia @ Ghongha, aged about 29 years, son of late Timtiya Khariya, Resident of Village- Dhidhaouli, PO & PS-Gumla, District: Gumla ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 6917 of 2026 Suresh Khariya @ Ghogha Khariya @ Suresh Kharia @ Ghongha, aged about 29 years, son of late Timtiya Khariya, Resident of Village- Dhidhaouli, PO & PS-Gumla, District: Gumla
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, APP
-------- Order No. 03 /Dated: 25th September 2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 in connection with ST Case No. 56 of 2026 arising out of Gumla PS Case No. 371 of 2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that out of 11 charge-sheeted witnesses one witness, who is the informant in this case, has been examined and he has not stated anything against this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.11.2025 as such he may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the statement made by the informant in para-20 of the cross-examination, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gumla in connection with ST Case No. 56 of 2026 arising out of Gumla PS Case No. 371 of 2025.
2026:JHHC:29001
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 29/09/2026