Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/798/2026 of KRISHNA KINKER DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO ITS SECRETARY, SHRI KRIPANAND JHA, DEPTT. OF SCHEDULED TRIBE, on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.798 of 2026 ------ Krishna Kinker Das, son of Late Bhawesh Chandra Das, resident of Mohalla Naya Tola, P.O. + P.S. Banka, District Banka, Bihar. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Shri

2026:JHHC:28932

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No.798 of 2026

------

Krishna Kinker Das, son of Late Bhawesh Chandra Das, resident of Mohalla Naya Tola, P.O. + P.S. Banka, District Banka, Bihar.

… … Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Shri Kripanand Jha, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

2. Shri Rajeev Arun Ekka, the Director, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. Shri Om Prakash, the Deputy Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

4. Shri Vinod Kumar Bankey, The Joint Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare at Ranchi, P.O., P.S. and District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

5. Shri Saurabh Kumar Bhuwania, The Deputy Commissioner- cum-District Magistrate, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar, Jharkhand.

6. Shri Dayanand Dubey, The District Welfare Officer, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG-IA ------

03/ 25.09.2026

Heard the parties.

2. This Contempt case has been filed by the petitioner against non-compliance of order dated 13.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.58 of 2026.

3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that a reasoned order has been passed, however, the petitioner is 2026:JHHC:28932

aggrieved by the same.

4. In view of the above submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out.

5. Accordingly, this Contempt Proceeding is dropped.

6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, before the appropriate Forum.

(ANANDA SEN, J.) 25th September, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2

Uploaded on 26.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead