Jharkhand High Court
B.A./6450/2026 of JAIDEV BAURI @ JAYDEV BAURI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6450 of 2026 Jaidev Bauri @ Jaydev Bauri, aged about 32 years, S/o-Ranjit Bauri @ Raju Bauri, R/o-Nutandih, PO-Bastoda, PS-Chandankiyari, Dist-Bokaro, Jharkhand, ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29003
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 6450 of 2026 Jaidev Bauri @ Jaydev Bauri, aged about 32 years, S/o-Ranjit Bauri @ Raju Bauri, R/o-Nutandih, PO-Bastoda, PS-Chandankiyari, Dist-Bokaro, Jharkhand,
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Karan Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, APP
-------- Order No. 03 /Dated: 25th September 2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in connection with ST No. 291 of 2025 arising out of Chandankiyari PS Case No. 105 of 2025. In this case charge has been framed under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that out of 13 witnesses only four witnesses have been examined till date. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.05.2025. As such, he submits that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Though a status report dated 25.08.2026 has been received, however, learned APP after verifying the status of the case before the trial Court submits that the case has already been fixed for statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
5. Having regard to the above, I am not inclined to the enlarge the petitioner, above-named, on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 29/09/2026