Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/814/2026 of VIKRAM KUMAR GAURAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.814 of 2026 ------ Vikram Kumar Gaurav, son of Arun Kumar Law, resident of Village Barwadih, P.O. & P.S. Barwadih, District Latehar. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Kripanand Jha, Secretary,
2026:JHHC:28931
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.814 of 2026
------
Vikram Kumar Gaurav, son of Arun Kumar Law, resident of Village Barwadih, P.O. & P.S. Barwadih, District Latehar. … … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Sri Kripanand Jha, Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, officiating at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kshitiz Priyanshu, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Ms. Shalini Shahdeo, AC to SC (L&C)-I ------
03/ 25.09.2026
Heard the parties.
2. This Contempt case has been filed by the petitioner against non-compliance of order dated 13.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.2655 of 2024.
3. It has been submitted by the parties that a decision has been taken by the opposite parties and a reasoned order to that effect has been passed, though against the petitioner.
4. Considering the aforesaid submission and the fact that mandamus in the aforesaid writ petition was only to take a decision, there is no deliberate violation of the order passed by the Writ Court.
5. Accordingly, this Contempt Proceeding is dropped.
6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, before the appropriate Forum. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 25th September, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 26.09.2026