Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8123/2026 of ANKIT KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHAEKHAND on 25 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8123 of 2026 ----- Ankit Kumar, S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Kokar, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, Dist- Ranchi .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28922
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8123 of 2026
----- Ankit Kumar, S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Kokar, P.O. & P.S. Sadar, Dist- Ranchi
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM
: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, AddI. P.P.
…...... 03/ 25.09.2026: This bail application has been filed u/s 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(3), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of B.N.S. and under Section 66B, 66C, 66D of IT Act.
2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order.
3. Learned AddI. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
4. There is an allegation against this petitioner and others that they were involved in cyber crime. In the bank account of the petitioner Rs. 45,000/- was credited by the informant.
5. As per the case diary, there is already a pending case being Doranda P.S. Case No.264 of 2020 against this petitioner (as per the ICJS Portal). The transaction of Rs.45,000/- from the account of the complainant to the account of the petitioner is revealed from the case diary. The phone number and account number of the petitioner matches with the account traced in the investigation. Further, as per the NCRP Portal, four other cybercrime complaints are already registered against the account number of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Cyber Case No.54 of 2025 (arising out of Cyber P.S. Case No.100 of 2025), pending in the Court of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-II- Cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Ranchi, stands rejected.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
8. The Trial Court is expected to conclude the trial within six months.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
25th September, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 26/09/2026