Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/61/2026 of JAI PRAKASH GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.61 of 2026 Jai Prakash Gupta, aged about – 65 years, Son of Late Rameshwar Sahu, Resident of Village – Harchanda, P.O – Ormanjhi, P.S. - Ormanjhi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. …… Petitioner Versus
2026:JHHC: 28935
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.61 of 2026
Jai Prakash Gupta, aged about – 65 years, Son of Late Rameshwar Sahu, Resident of Village – Harchanda, P.O –
Ormanjhi, P.S. - Ormanjhi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.
…… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Shri Manjunath Bhagantri, the Deputy
Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O – G.P.O., P.S. - Kotwali, District – Ranchi.
3. Shri Sunil Kumar Chandra, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi, P.O – G.P.O., P.S. - Kotwali, District – Ranchi.
4. Shri Ujjwal Kumar Soren, the Circle Officer, Ormanjhi, P.O + P.S. - Ormanjhi, District – Ranchi. …... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indu Shekhar Gupta, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Amitesh Kr. Geasen, AC to AAG-IA --------
07/Dated: 25
th September, 2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnors/ opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 04.09.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.4811 of 2025.
2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the order dated 04.09.2025 has already been complied with.
3. In that view of the matter, the present contempt petition is, hereby, disposed of.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 25th September, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 29.09.2026