Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/1379/2025 of SWADES KUMAR CHAULYA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1379 of 2025 Swades Kumar Chulya, aged about 56 years, son of Subat Chandra Chulya, resident of 206, Madhuri Palace, Bartand, P.O and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of
2026:JHHC: 28936
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.1379 of 2025
Swades Kumar Chulya, aged about 56 years, son of Subat Chandra Chulya, resident of 206, Madhuri Palace, Bartand, P.O and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
…… Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Mr. Dinesh Ray, son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. …... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kishore, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Sanket Khanna, AC to Sr. AAG Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG --------
11/Dated: 25
th September, 2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnors/ opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 31.07.2025, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.3631 of 2025. It is a case of prohibited list of NGDRS.
2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State suggesting that the order dated 31.07.2025 has been complied with.
3. Vide order dated 14.08.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner was given an opportunity to verify the affidavit, filed on behalf of the State, but that has not been done and today also an adjournment has been sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Since the order dated 31.07.2025 has already been complied with, I am not inclined to keep the present proceeding pending. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is, hereby, disposed of.
5. I.A. No.11528 of 2026, filed on behalf of O.P. No.02 for exemption from personal appearance, also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 25th September, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 29.09.2026