Jharkhand High Court
B.A./3905/2026 of DANARUL SK. Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 3905 of 2026 Danarul Sk. Aged about 68 years, S/o-Lt. Khawab Ali, resident of Village- Lakhanpur, PO Lakhanpur, PS Pakur (M), District-Pakur ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29002
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 3905 of 2026 Danarul Sk. Aged about 68 years, S/o-Lt. Khawab Ali, resident of Village- Lakhanpur, PO Lakhanpur, PS Pakur (M), District-Pakur
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate
Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Ravidas, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP
-------- Order No. 05 /Dated: 25th September 2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and under Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) PS Case No. 242 of 2025 corresponding to ST No. 34 of 2026.
3. Learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that name of the petitioner has not been taken in the dying declaration. He further submits that the petitioner is old person and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.11.2025. As such, he submits that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. A status report has been received by this Court wherein the expected time for conclusion of the trial is given as December 2026; having regard to the same, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 29/09/2026