Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9011/2026 of TETRA DEVI @ NIRMALA DEVI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28927 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A . No. 9011 of 2026 --- Tetra Devi @ Nirmala Devi … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28927 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 9011 of 2026
---
Tetra Devi @ Nirmala Devi
… … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party
---
CORAM
: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Special P.P.
---
2/25.09.2026 Heard Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Special P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Rail Hatia P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected twice.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2024 and he does not have any criminal antecedent. It has further been submitted that from the possession of the petitioner 16 kg. of Ganja was recovered which is less than the commercial quantity.
Learned Special P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
It seems that from the joint possession of the petitioner and other accused 69 kg. of Ganja was recovered and considering the quantity of Ganja recovered and the recovery being specific from the petitioner as well, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail and the present application stands rejected once again at this stage.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) R. Shekhar Cp 3