Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8362/2026 of AJAY KUMAR SINHA ALIAS AJAY KR SINHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 25 September 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28941 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8362 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Sinha @ Ajay Kr. Sinha ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mrs. J. Mazumdar,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28941 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8362 of 2026
Ajay Kumar Sinha @ Ajay Kr. Sinha
... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
---
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate; Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocate For the State
: A.P.P.
---
02/25.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 4737 of 2026.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an amount of Rs.35,00,000/-, which was lying in the account of the petitioner was frozen and subsequently, by the order of the learned trial Court, the amount has been released in favour of the informant. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2025.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that out of five charge-sheeted witnesses, two witnesses have been examined so far.
It appears from the allegations that an amount of Rs.59,44,307/- was transferred by the informant but it seems that an amount of Rs.35,00,000/- was lying in the account of the petitioner, which was frozen and was subsequently ordered to be released in favour of the informant. There is no explanation with respect to the balance amount which was transferred and considering the fact that the trial is at its fag end, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner which stands rejected once again at this stage.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.) 25.09.2026 S.B. Uploaded on 28.09.2026