B.A./8956/2026 of DHIRAJ YADAV ALIAS DHIRAJ KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2026 in connection with Chalkusa P.S. Case No. 66/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 76, 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 324(4), 333, 352, 74, 351(2) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribagh.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and 31 others that on 24.06.2026 at about 11:00 p.m., the accused persons armed with lathis, sticks, spades, tangis and iron rods formed an unlawful assembly and pelted stones at informant’s house and broke down the newly cast roof and damaged the house. They also threatened the informant and her family to leave their land. The learned counsel submits that there is further specific allegation against one Yugal Yadav to have caught the lady by her hair and other co- accused, namely, Shankar yadav and Prakash Yadav had assaulted her and she raised alarm.

3. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific overt act and the allegation is general and omnibus and there appears to be some land dispute between the parties. There is a counter case, in which, one of the co-accused in the present case, namely, Bansi Yadav died on 11.07.2026. Charge-sheet has already been submitted.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on materials on record and the impugned order, are not in dispute.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that so far as the petitioner is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation; there appears to be some land dispute between the parties and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribagh in connection with Chalkusa P.S. Case No. 66/2026, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

(vi) The petitioner shall not disturb the informant party in any manner whatsoever. In the event of any such occurrence of disturbance, it shall be open to the informant party to move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner before the concerned court.

6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

Dated: 24.09.2026

Uploaded On: 28.09.2026

Mukul/-