Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./1055/2026 of CHUMNU KISHOR TIGGA Vs ASHWINI TIGGA on 24 September 2026
) -1- C.M.P. No. 1055 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1055 of 2026 Chumnu Kishor Tigga, aged about 63 years, S/o Late Birsa Tigga, resident of Village- Shanti Nagar Garhra Toli under P.O. & P.S. Kokar, District- Ranchi … Petitioner -Versus- 1.
( 2026:JHHC:28731 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 1055 of 2026
Chumnu Kishor Tigga, aged about 63 years, S/o Late Birsa Tigga, resident of Village- Shanti Nagar Garhra Toli under P.O. & P.S. Kokar, District- Ranchi
… Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ashwini Tigga, aged about 27 years, D/o Chumnu Kishor Tigga, R/o Shanti Nagar, Garha Toli under P.O. & P.S. Kokar, District- Ranchi
2. The Branch Manager, UCO Bank having its office under P.O. Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi
3. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Magnum Fund having its office at Jokhiram Chambers, Besides Sainik Market, Main Road, under P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi
4. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Lalpur Branch having its office under P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi
5. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India (Barauni Branch), Biharsharif having its office under P.O. & P.S. Barauni, District- Biharsharif (Bihar)
6. General Public of Shanti Nagar, Garha Toli under P.O. & P.S. Kokar, District- Ranchi
7. Saroj Minz, D/o Late Laxman Bhagat, R/o Lalpur Peace Road under P.O. Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi … Opposite Parties
----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :
-----
04/24.09.2026 This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting-aside the order dated 09.07.2026 passed in Succession Case No.09/2024 by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, XX at Ranchi, whereby, he has been pleased to allow the intervention petition filed by opposite party no.7 under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that stranger has been allowed to intervene in the petition by the impugned order. He further submits that the learned Court has not appreciated the spirit of Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure and in view of that, the impugned order may kindly be set-aside.
( 2026:JHHC:28731 )
3. On perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that the learned Court has kept everything open to be decided at the time of final adjudication of the said succession case and has held that evidentiary value shall be examined at the time of final adjudication of the succession proceeding. The grounds taken by the petitioner in the present C.M.P. are kept open by the learned Court to be decided at the time of final adjudication of the said succession case.
4. In that view of the matter, Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take all the grounds before the learned Court in the pending succession case.
5. Accordingly, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 24th September, 2026 Ajay/