Jharkhand High Court
Cr.Rev./865/2022 of SHAILESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 865 of 2022 Shailesh Kumar, aged about 52 years, son of Late Shushil Kumar Lal, resident of Village-Hamidganj, P.O. & P.S.-Daltonganj, District- Palamau … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:28853 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 865 of 2022
Shailesh Kumar, aged about 52 years, son of Late Shushil Kumar Lal, resident of Village-Hamidganj, P.O. & P.S.-Daltonganj, District- Palamau
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
--- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Sr. Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl. P.P.
: Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P.
---
10/24.09.2026
This Cr. Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.06.2022 passed by learned Spl. Judge A.C.B. Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Misc. Cr. Application No.1256 of 2022 filed in Vigilance Case No. 03 of 2018 arising out of Daltonganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 44 of 2017 whereby the petition filed under Section 227 of Cr.P.C for discharge filed on behalf of the petitioner has been dismissed. The case is now pending in the court of learned Spl. Judge ACB, Palamau at Daltonganj.
2. It has been submitted that the trial has proceeded and some witnesses have also been examined. The learned counsel submits that at this stage the present case has become infructuous and he does not want to press the present revision petition. He seeks liberty to raise all the grounds at the stage of trial.
3. The learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer made.
4. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( 2026:JHHC:28853 )
2
5. However, withdrawal of this case will not prejudice the case of the petitioner in any manner.
6. Liberty is reserved with the petitioner to raise all the points before the learned Court at appropriate stage.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: