Jharkhand High Court
Cr.Rev./303/2024 of NIRMAL KUMAR JAIN Vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION on 24 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 303 of 2024 Nirmal Kumar Jain aged about 64 years, son of Sri Parasmal Kumar Jain, Resident of 188- A /13 Maniktalla, Main Road, Karkugachi, P.O. Karkugachi, P.S. Maniktalla, Kolkata-54, District Kolkata, State West Bengal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:28983 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 303 of 2024
Nirmal Kumar Jain aged about 64 years, son of Sri Parasmal Kumar Jain, Resident of 188-A/13 Maniktalla, Main Road, Karkugachi, P.O. Karkugachi, P.S. Maniktalla, Kolkata-54, District Kolkata, State West Bengal
… … Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through the Central Bureau of Investigation
…
… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Shankar Tiwary, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI
: Mr. Siddhant Sethi, AC to ASGI
12/24.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 09.02.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 279 of 2024 by the learned AJC-XIII cum Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi by which the discharge petition preferred by the petitioner for discharging himself in connection with Case No. RC07(A)2018-D registered under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 7,8,12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (d) of the P.C. Act, 1988 has been rejected which is pending in the court of AJC-VIII cum Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points at appropriate stage.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. The withdrawal of this case will not prejudice the petitioner in any manner and it will be open to the petitioner to raise all the points at appropriate stage as permissible under law.
7. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.09.2026 Uploaded on 30.09.2026 Binit/