Jharkhand High Court
Cr.Rev./720/2026 of RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH A.C.B. on 24 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 720 of 2026 Ramesh Kumar Singh, aged about 46, son of Late Sujendra Singh, resident of Kalyanpur Rim Pass, P.O. Athmal Gola, P.S. Patna, District Patna, At present Dhaiya, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:28973 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 720 of 2026
Ramesh Kumar Singh, aged about 46, son of Late Sujendra Singh, resident of Kalyanpur Rim Pass, P.O. Athmal Gola, P.S. Patna, District Patna, At present Dhaiya, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through ACB … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA III
---
05/24.09.2026
This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 28.08.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge – X – cum – Special Judge (ACB), Dhanbad in Special (Vigilance) Case No.12 of 2019 (MCA No.938 of 2023) for the offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act and cognizance has been taken under Section 7 (a) of P.C. Act, whereby application preferred under section 239 of Cr.P.C by the petitioner for his discharge, has been rejected, now the case is pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – X – cum – Special Judge (ACB), Dhanbad.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as the stage has changed.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal.
4. Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. However, withdrawal of this case will not prejudice the case of the petitioner in any manner.
6. Liberty is reserved with the petitioner to raise all the points ( 2026:JHHC:28973 )
2
before the learned Court at appropriate stage.
7. Pending I.A., if any, is closed.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: