Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8241/2026 of ROHIT MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8241 of 2026 Rohit Mandal, aged about 23 years, S/o – Bhim Mandal, R/o – Bana Nawada, P.O. + P.S. – Madhupur, District – Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28790
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8241 of 2026
Rohit Mandal, aged about 23 years, S/o – Bhim Mandal, R/o – Bana Nawada, P.O. + P.S. – Madhupur, District – Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, APP
---
06/24.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.84 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(B),66(C),66(D), 84 ( C) of IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted on 24.08.2026. It is submitted that 3 crime links have been found and 2 victims have been identified to the extent of Rs.65,626/- and Rs.3,07,504/-. The learned counsel submits that out of the recovered mobile phones and Sim cards, 2 belong to the petitioner and his family members and 1 belongs to a 3rd party.
4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum –
2026:JHHC:28790
Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.84 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:29.09.2026