Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./1060/2026 of BAIJU MARDI Vs PHUDU MAJHIAN on 24 September 2026
) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 1060 of 2026 Baiju Mardi, aged about 71 years, son of late Mithu Majhi, resident of village-Dhirol, P.O. and P.S. Potka, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand …………….Petitioner -Versus- 1. Phudu
( 2026:JHHC:28739 )
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P No. 1060 of 2026
Baiju Mardi, aged about 71 years, son of late Mithu Majhi, resident of village-Dhirol, P.O. and P.S. Potka, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
…………….Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Phudu Majhian, wife of Thakra Majhi, resident of village-Dhirol, P.O. and P.S. Potka, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
2. Shankar Hembrom son of late Xepra Majhian, resident of village- Kashidih, P.O. and P.S. Potka, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
3. Sukhdeo Singh, son of Haru Singh, resident of village-Dhirol, P.O. and P.S. Potka, District-East Singhbhum
4. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, District-East Singhbhum
.…. … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Dilip Kr. Karmakar, Advocate
For the Resp. No.4 :Mr. Sachin Kumar, A.C. to S.C.-I
02/ 24.09.2026: This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 22.04.2026 passed by the learned Sub-Judge-XIII, Jamshedpur in Original Title Suit No. 339 of 2024, whereby the learned court has been pleased to reject the petition dated 07.04.2026 filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take all the grounds including the subject matter of genealogy at the argument stage before the learned court in the pending suit.
3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
Dt.24.09.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/-