Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/286/2018 of UMESH PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 286 of 2018 Umesh Prasad, aged about 65 years, son of Sri Ramashray Prasad, resident of Village – Parthu, P.S. – Ekanger Sarai, P.O. – Parthu, District – Nalanda (Bihar) presently resident of Qr.
2026:JHHC:28818-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 286 of 2018
Umesh Prasad, aged about 65 years, son of Sri Ramashray Prasad, resident of Village – Parthu, P.S. – Ekanger Sarai, P.O. – Parthu, District – Nalanda (Bihar) presently resident of Qr. No. B/1106, Sector-II, Dhurwa, P.O. – Dhurwa, P.S. – Jagarnathpur, District –
Ranchi (Jharkhand).
….. Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….. Respondent
WITH
Manti Devi @ Smt. Manati Devi
….. Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….. Respondent
---------
CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
SRI PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
--------
For the Appellant
: Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate.
Mrs. Rishika Bajaj, Advocate.
Mr. Arpit Khadelwal, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P.
[In Cr.A. (D.B.) No. 286/2018]
Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
Ms. Malsi Pathak, A.C. to P.P.
[In Cr.A. (D.B.) No. 285/2018]
---------
Order No. 10/Dated: 24th September, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has already served the sentence and has been released from confinement. Thus, he does not want to press this appeal.
2. Considering the aforesaid submission, there is no watch to considering the merits, since the appellant has already served the sentence and has been released, therefore, this appeal is dismissed.
2026:JHHC:28818-DB
3. In this appeal, appellant is not in custody, as she is on bail. As per roster, this Division Bench is assigned to hear the criminal appeals, where appellants are in custody.
4. Since the appellant is not in custody, let this appeal go out of our list to be listed before appropriate Bench after taking necessary permission from Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
(Ananda Sen, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
September 24, 2026 Sunil/- Uploaded on 25.09.2026