Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/533/2026 of SURAJ YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 533 of 2026 ------ 1. Suraj Yadav, aged about 69 years, S/o- Late Ramdahin Yadav, 2. Rishikesh Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav, aged about 33 years, S/o- Late Suneshwar Yadav, All are R/o vill- Jobraiyan, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa,
2026:JHHC:28737
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 533 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Suraj Yadav, aged about 69 years, S/o- Late Ramdahin Yadav,
2. Rishikesh Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav, aged about 33 years, S/o- Late Suneshwar Yadav, All are R/o vill- Jobraiyan, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Manish Kumar, S/o Iswari Ram, R/o vill- Ashok Bihar Jobariya, PO & PS- Garhwa, District- Garhwa, at permanent resident of village- Patila, PO & PS Kandi, District Garhwa, Jharkhand.
.... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Sanjeet Nayak, Advocate
------
Order No.05/Dated : 24.09.2026
1. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum- Special Judge, SC/ST(PoA) Act, Garhwa in A.B.P No.221 of 2026 in connection with Garhwa SC/ST P.S. Case No.06 of 2024, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected, registered for the offence under Sections 352, 351(2), 117(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and under Section 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum- Special Judge, SC/ST(PoA) Act, Garhwa.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal with a liberty to approach the trial Court and pray for grant of regular bail.
3. Learned counsel for the other sides have raised no objection.
4. The trial Court is directed to consider the prayer of the appellants and decide the matter on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this withdrawal.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 24.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 25.09.2026