Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8161/2026 of MANISH ORAON Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8161 of 2026 Manish Oraon, aged about 22 years, S/o Jhari Oraon, R/o Village – Toti Hesla, P.O. & P.S. – Bariyatu, District – Latehar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28762
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8161 of 2026
Manish Oraon, aged about 22 years, S/o Jhari Oraon, R/o Village – Toti Hesla, P.O. & P.S. – Bariyatu, District – Latehar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate
: Ms. Manisha Kumari, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, APP
---
07/24.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.34 of 2026, registered under Sections 96 and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Latehar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted and charge has also been framed. He submits that the allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner assisted the victims aged 17 years 6 months and 13 years, who are cousin sisters to travel from one place to another. Learned counsel submits that the statement of the victims recorded under Section 183 BNSS be perused.
4. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner had booked the train tickets. However, apart from the statement of the victims under Section 180 in this regard, there is no material regarding booking of train tickets, to which, the learned counsel submits that there have been 87 calls between the petitioner and the victims.
5. Upon perusal of the statement of the victims recorded under Section 183 BNSS, no allegation has been made against the petitioner. The fact remains that charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2026:JHHC:28762
Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C., Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.34 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:29.09.2026