Jharkhand High Court

Cr.A(SJ)/386/2026 of DEBASHISH ROY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

23.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 24.09.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 386 of 2026 ------ Debashish Roy, age about- 54 yrs, S/o- Late Gautam Roy, R/o Roy Kuthi, Line Tank Road, Chadri Ward No. 22, Old Ward No. 18, Chadri, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O:- G.P.O.

2026:JHHC:28574

23.09.2026

Vedanti/

Uploaded on 24.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 386 of 2026

------

Debashish Roy, age about- 54 yrs, S/o- Late Gautam Roy, R/o Roy Kuthi, Line Tank Road, Chadri Ward No. 22, Old Ward No. 18, Chadri, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O:- G.P.O. District- Ranchi- 834001, Jharkhand.

....

....

….

Appellant(s)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Bablu Munda, S/o Late Karu Munda, aged about 40 years, R/o village:- Chadri, Line Tank Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 834001.

.... .... .... Respondent(s)

With Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 183 of 2026

Rajib Roy, age about 62 yrs, S/o Birendra Nath Roy, R/o Roy Kuthi, Line Tank Road, Chadri Ward No. 22, Old Ward No. 18, Chadri, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O:- G.P.O. District- Ranchi- 834001, Jharkhand

.... .... …. Appellant(s)

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Bablu Munda, S/o Late Karu Munda, aged about 40 years, R/o village:- Chadri, Line Tank Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi 834001

.... .... .... Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Adv.

Ms. Tanya Rai, Adv.

For the State

: Ms. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Master Akash, Adv.

------

Order No.06/Dated : 23.09.2026

1. In pursuant to the order dated 08.09.2026, Mr. Animanand Roshan Toppo, S.I.-cum-Officer In-charge, SC/ST P.S.-Ranchi, is physically present before this Court.

2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the trial Court. Now, there is no apprehension of arrest.

3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants seek permission to withdraw these appeals with a liberty to work-out their remedy in accordance with law.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents have raised no objection.

5. Accordingly, both these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

6. The personal appearance of aforesaid official is hereby dispensed with.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead