Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./1028/2026 of SHYAM KISHORE SAHU Vs RAAJ BARDHAN JAYASWAL on 23 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 1028 of 2026 …. Shyam Kishore Sahu, son of Balak Ram Sahu, aged about 66 years, resident of Ashok Nagar, Road No.5, Puran Bihar, Argora, P.O. & P.S. – Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand ……Petitioner
2026:JHHC:28744
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P No. 1028 of 2026
….
Shyam Kishore Sahu, son of Balak Ram Sahu, aged about 66
years, resident of Ashok Nagar, Road No.5, Puran Bihar, Argora, P.O. & P.S. – Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand
……Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Raaj Bardhan Jayaswal, son of Somar Singh Jayaswal, resident of Murhu, P.O. & P.S.- Murhu, District – Khunti, Jharkhand, currently residing at 74/1, Sheikh Para Lane, P.O. & P.S. – Shibpuri, District – Howrah, West Bengal.
2. Raj Kumar Roy, son of Late Jagannath Roy, Resident of 1/38, Nelin Nagar, Calcutta Garfa, Calcutta, P.O. Garfa, P.S. – Kasba, District – South 24 Parganas, Pin 700078, West Bengal
……Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate
For the O.P.
: Md. Abdul Wahab, Advocate
……
Order No.03/23rd September, 2026
1. Heard Mr. Shresth Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Abdul Wahab, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the date of hearing i.e. on 12.08.2026, there was ongoing student protest in Ranchi and multiple barricading were placed in the way of towards the High Court and the learned counsel for the petitioner was stuck in the traffic jam and due to which he could not appear in the case and hence and the Civil Revision No. 45 of 2022 may be restored to its original file
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that he has served a copy of memo of this C.M.P. upon Md. Abdul Wahab, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2026:JHHC:28744
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 have raised no objection.
5. It appears that from the order dated 12.08.2026 passed by this Court, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, due to which the Civil Revision No. 45 of 2022 has been dismissed for default.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the averments made in paragraph nos. 4 and 5 in C.M.P No.1028 of 2026 and also considering the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear on 12.08.2026 due to ongoing student protest in Ranchi, the present C.M.P No.1028 of 2026 is allowed and Civil Revision No. 45 of 2022 is restored to its original file.
7. Accordingly, C.M.P No.1028 of 2026, is allowed and stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated :- 23.09.2026 Nishant/-