Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/658/2014 of SANJAY SINHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CBI on 23 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 658 of 2014 Sanjay Sinha, S/o Dr. N.P. Sinha, Resident of Sushila Niwas, Hinoo Main Road, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi … … Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand through CBI … … Respondent --- CORAM:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28899
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 658 of 2014
Sanjay Sinha, S/o Dr. N.P. Sinha, Resident of Sushila Niwas, Hinoo Main Road, P.O. Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi
… … Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through CBI
… … Respondent ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Appellant : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, Advocate
: Mr. Apurv, Advocate
: Mrs. Moushmi Chatterjee, Advocate
For the CBI
: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI
: Ms. Shivani Jaluka, AC to ASGI
--- 03/23.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This Criminal Appeal (SJ) has been filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 23.08.2014 passed in Case No.R.C.54A/1996 by the learned Special Judge-II, C.B.I. (A.H.D. Scam Cases), Ranchi. By the said judgment, the appellant was held guilty under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A along with 120 – B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 jointly and individually under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. The learned Special Judge awarded common sentence to the appellant and directed to undergo RI for 3 years with fine of Rs.25,000/- for all the offences under Section 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC, in default of payment of fine he was directed to further serve 6 months S.I.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has expired and their legal heirs do not want to pursue the appeal, but the death certificate has been forwarded to the learned counsel for the appellant which has been placed on record along with 2026:JHHC:28899
the mention slip. He submits that accordingly this appeal has abated and the learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the present appeal.
4. Learned counsel for the CBI has no objection so far as the aforesaid prayer of the appellant is concerned.
5. Considering the submissions, this appeal is treated as abated.
6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through Fax/email.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of order: 23.09.2026 Date of uploading: 29.09.2026 Saurav/-