Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/795/2026 of MD. SALAHUDDIN @ GAZI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 795 of 2026 ------ Md. Salahuddin @ Gazi, aged about 47 years, son of Late Md. Sirajuddin @ Siraj Mandal, resident of Village- Radipur, P.O. Radipur, P.S. Maheshpur Radipur (O.P.), District- Pakur (Jharkhand). .... ....
2026:JHHC:28576
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 795 of 2026
------
Md. Salahuddin @ Gazi, aged about 47 years, son of Late Md.
Sirajuddin @ Siraj Mandal, resident of Village- Radipur, P.O. Radipur, P.S. Maheshpur Radipur (O.P.), District- Pakur (Jharkhand).
....
....
….
Appellant(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Ranjit Dom, son of Late Sadhin Dom, resident of Village- Radipur (O.P.), District- Pakur (Jharkhand) .... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Om Prakash, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. S.K. Srivastava, A.P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Adv.
------
Order No.04/Dated : 23.09.2026
1. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 10.07.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST(PoA) Act, Pakur in A.B.P No.305 of 2026 in connection with Pakur SC/ST P.S. Case No.11 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 351(3), 352, 308(2) of B.N.S. and under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA) Act, Pakur.
2. After some arguments, learned Senior counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the other side have raised no objection.
4. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 23.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 24.09.2026