Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/517/2012 of VIJAY KUMAR MALLIK Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CBI on 23 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 517 of 2012 Vijay Kumar Mallik, S/o late Inder Lal Mallik, Resident of 26, Engineers Enclave P.S. Pitampura P.O. Pitampura District New Delhi … … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I… … Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28888
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 517 of 2012
Vijay Kumar Mallik, S/o late Inder Lal Mallik, Resident of 26, Engineers Enclave P.S. Pitampura P.O. Pitampura District New Delhi
… … Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I… … Respondent ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Appellant : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, Advocate
: Mr. Apurv, Advocate
: Mrs. Moushmi Chatterjee, Advocate
For the CBI
: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI
: Ms. Shivani Jaluka, AC to ASGI
--- 03/23.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This Criminal Appeal (SJ) has been filed against the judgment of conviction dated 03.05.2012 and order of sentence dated 07.05.2012 passed in Case No.R.C.31(A)/1996 by the learned Special Judge-V, C.B.I. (A.H.D. Scam Cases), Ranchi. By the said judgment, the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 120B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13 (2) read with (1) (c ) & (d) of the P.C. Act. The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.10 lakhs under Section 420 IPC, R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.50 lacs under Section 467 IPC, RI for 4 years with fine of Rs. 10 lacs under Section 468, RI for 4 years with fine of Rs.10 lacs under Section 471 IPC, RI for 4 years with fine of Rs. 10 lacs under Section 477A IPC and R.I. of 4 years with fine of Rs.10 lacs under Section 120B IPC, with a total fine of Rs.1 Crore and in default, S.I
2026:JHHC:28888
for 1 year. However, the learned court passed order that the sentences shall run concurrently.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has expired and their legal heirs do not want to pursue the appeal, but the death certificate has been forwarded to the learned counsel for the appellant which has been placed on record along with the mention slip. He submits that accordingly this appeal has abated and the learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the present appeal.
4. Learned counsel for the CBI has no objection so far as the aforesaid prayer of the appellant is concerned.
5. Considering the submissions, this appeal is treated as abated.
6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through Fax/email.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of order: 23.09.2026 Date of uploading: 29.09.2026 Saurav/