Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8814/2026 of DEEPAK KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8814 of 2026 Deepak Kumar Das, aged about 19 years, son of Jaytha Das @ Jathu Das, resident of village + post – Jamni Paharpur, P.S. – Godda (M), District – Godda, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28654
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8814 of 2026
Deepak Kumar Das, aged about 19 years, son of Jaytha Das @ Jathu Das, resident of village + post – Jamni Paharpur, P.S. – Godda (M), District – Godda, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, APP
---
03/23.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2026 in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2026, registered under Sections 96 of the BNS Act, now pending in the court of learned C.J.M. Godda.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was lodged when the victim was found missing and from the mobile, the photo and details of the petitioner could be found. He submits that the impugned order clearly reveals that the victim has been recovered and her statement has been recorded under Section 183 BNSS, where she has stated that she herself went with the accused and they were in love affair with each other. He submits that there is no allegation of any sexual assault. The petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2026. Charge – sheet has been submitted and cognizance has already been taken.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim is minor aged 16 years.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that as per the impugned order itself, the victim has given her statement that she was having love affair with the petitioner aged 19 years and she herself went to the accused, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2026:JHHC:28654
Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Godda in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:23.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:29.09.2026