Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8380/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8380 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Kr. Yadav, aged about 19 years, son of Moti Yadav, resident of Kajrail, P.O. & P.S.- Thakurgangti, District- Godda. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28610
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8380 of 2026
Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Kr. Yadav, aged about 19 years, son of Moti Yadav, resident of Kajrail, P.O. & P.S.- Thakurgangti, District- Godda.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, APP
---
05/23.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2026 in connection with Mirzachowki P.S. Case No. 58 of 2026, registered under Sections 64(1) and 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M. at Sahibganj.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the victim was major and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 be considered.
4. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the victim has stated that on 16.06.2026 the petitioner did wrong to her, but the same had happened with her consent and her elder brother-in-law had forced her to file the case.
6. Considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the charge- sheet having been submitted , the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. at Sahibganj in connection with Mirzachowki
2026:JHHC:28610
2
P.S. Case No. 58 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:23.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.09.2026