Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./3698/2022 of PASHUPATI KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 3698 of 2022 Pashupati Kumar aged about 53 years, Son of - Balmiki Mandal, Junior Engineer, Special Division, NREP (Block Jhikpani) Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.- Chaibasa, West Singhbhum (Presently Posted at- National Highway
( 2026:JHHC:28721 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 3698 of 2022
Pashupati Kumar aged about 53 years, Son of- Balmiki Mandal, Junior Engineer, Special Division, NREP (Block Jhikpani) Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.- Chaibasa, West Singhbhum (Presently Posted at- National Highway Division Medini Nagar), R/o Sadar Chaibasa, P.O.
& P.S.- Chaibasa, West Singhbhum, Jharkhand … …
Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Ram Ashis Ram S/o Late Mosafir Ram, Executive Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme, West Singhbhum Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District- Chaibasa, Jharkhand, West Singhbhum (Informant of Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2011,
3. Director Anti-corruption Bureau, Kanke Road, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate
08/23.09.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
2. This Cr. M.P. has been filed for the following reliefs:-
(i) For quashing the vigilance P.S. case no. 15 of 2015 against the petitioner and ors. for the offence under section 406/409/466/468/120B of the I.P.C. and section 13(2) r/w section 13(1) (c) (d) of P.C. Act 1988.
(ii) For quashing the investigation and proceeding that the prosecution has initiated against the petitioner on the basis of the said FIR’S.
(iii) For any other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts of the instant case.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case has become infructuous and therefore he does not want to press it.
4. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this petition is dismissed as not pressed.
5. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 23.09.2026 Uploaded on 28.09.2026 Binit/