Jharkhand High Court
C.M.P./908/2026 of SHOBHA DEVI Vs EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED (ECL) THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR on 23 September 2026
) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 908 of 2026 Shobha Devi, wife of late Munna Pandit, Aged about 41 years, resident of village-Bansdiha, P.O. Lohandiya Bazar, P.S. Lalmatia, District-Godda, Jharkhand-814165 …………….Petitioner
( 2026:JHHC:28560 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P No. 908 of 2026
Shobha Devi, wife of late Munna Pandit, Aged about 41 years, resident of village-Bansdiha, P.O. Lohandiya Bazar, P.S. Lalmatia, District-Godda, Jharkhand-814165
…………….Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Eastern Coalfields Limited (ECL) through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Sanctoria, P.O. Dishergarh, P.S.-Sanctoria, District-Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal-713333.
2. General Manager (IC) Rajmahal Mining Project, Rajmahal Area Office, ECL, Dhankunda, P.O. Bara Simra, P.S. Mahagama, District-Godda, Jharkhand-814165
3. Sandeep Kumar @ Prahlad Pandit, son of late Harihar Pandit, Village- Bansdiha, P.O. Lalmatia, P.S. Lalmatia, District-Godda, Jharkhand-814165.
.…. … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Deependra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 :-Anupam Shandilya, Advocate
:Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
02/ 23.09.2026: Heard Mr. Deependra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anupam Shandilya, learned counsel for the O.P. Nos.1 and 2.
2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside order dated 13.05.2026 passed in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2023 by the learned Tribunal, Godda under Coal Bearing Areas Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Court has been pleased to dismiss the said case for default and in view of that this petition has been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 submits that petitioner’s remedy is there to file the petition before the learned Tribunal for recalling and re-admitting the said Misc. Case however, without doing so the petitioner ( 2026:JHHC:28560 )
straightway has filed the present petition before this Court.
5. It transpires from the record that petitioner has not filed petition before the learned court to recall and re-admit the said Misc. Case and straightway this petition has been filed. The provisions are there of re- admitting the case under the C.P.C. In view of that this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition before the Tribunal under Order XXII Rule 9 of C.PC for recalling the said order dated 13.05.2026 passed in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2023.
6. This petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
Dt.23.09.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/-