Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2677/2026 of DEVRAJ LOHRA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 23 September 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28765 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2677 of 2026 --------- Devraj Lohra, age 19 years S/o Rajendra Lohra, R/o Vill-Nawaghar Patratoli, P.O. & P.S.Raidih, District- Gumla ..… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28765 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2677 of 2026
--------- Devraj Lohra, age 19 years S/o Rajendra Lohra, R/o Vill-Nawaghar Patratoli, P.O. & P.S.Raidih, District- Gumla
..… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
….. Opp. Party
---------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Altamas Khan, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
---------- 03/23.09.2026 This Cr.M.P. has been filed for restoration of Cr.Appeal (S.J.) No. 855 of 2025, which was dismissed for default vide order dated 27.11.2025 passed by this Court.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on 27.11.2025, the petitioner’s counsel forgot to mark the list and therefore, he could not appear before the Court on time and the case was dismissed for default. It is further submitted that due to the above mistake on the part of the counsel for the petitioner, the client should not suffer and he further prayed that if this application is not allowed the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and hence, the Cr.Appeal (S.J.) No. 855 of 2025 may be restored and this Cr.M.P. may be allowed.
3. Learned A.P.P. has raised no objection.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in this Cr.M.P., especially in Para No.s 4, 5 and 6, it appears that learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted that he could not appear due to a mistake on his part.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:28765 )
5. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer for restoration of Cr.Appeal (S.J.) No. 855 of 2025 is allowed.
6. Accordingly, Cr.Appeal (S.J.) No. 855 of 2025 be restored to its original file.
7. Thus, this Cr.M.P. No. 2677 of 2026 is allowed.
8. The Office is directed to place the said Cr.Appeal (S.J.) No.
of before the appropriate Bench as per roster.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 23.09.2026