Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5179/2026 of SAJID @ MD. SAJID IRAQUE Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A . B. A . No. 5179 of 2026 Sajid @ Md. Sajid Iraque aged about 30 years, son of Md. Tunna @ Md. Firdosh Alam, resident of Upperkulhi, Jharia, P.O. and P.S. Jharia, District- Dhanbad ...... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand
( 2026:JHHC:28466 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 5179 of 2026
Sajid @ Md. Sajid Iraque aged about 30 years, son of Md. Tunna @ Md.
Firdosh Alam, resident of Upperkulhi, Jharia, P.O. and P.S. Jharia, District- Dhanbad
...... … Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Union of India, through cum Post Commander R.P.F. Bhojudih, South Eastern Railway, P.o. Bhojudih, P.S. Chandankiyari, District-Dhanbad .…. … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. For the UOI
: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
: Ms. Aarti Kumari, Advocate
02/ 21.09.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhojudih RPF Post Case No. 04 of 2026, registered under section 3(a) RPUP Act, pending in the Court of learned Rly. J.M., Dhanbad.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that 10 Nos. CST-9 plate fitted with tie-bar has been recovered from the possession of co- accused namely, Shyam Kumar Rajak. He next submits that the said Shyam Kumar Rajak stated that he intended to sell the said article to this petitioner and apart from that that there is no allegation against the petitioner and even purchase has not been made by the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 7 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned counsels for the State and Union of India oppose the prayer and submit that one of the apprehended co-accused has taken the ( 2026:JHHC:28466 )
name of this petitioner.
5. Allegations against the petitioner are made that apprehended accused has intended to sell the said article to this petitioner and apart from that that there is no allegation against the petitioner. Even the purchase has not been made by the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 7 of the petition.
6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Rly. J.M., Dhanbad, in connection with Bhojudih RPF Post Case No. 04 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.21.09.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-