Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5231/2026 of ASHISH YADAV ALIAS ASHISH KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
No. 5231 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5231 of 2026 ---- 1. Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Mahesh Yadav 2. Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 32 years, son of Saryu Yadav 3. Mukesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 36 years, son
2026:JHHC:28496
--1--
A.B.A. No. 5231 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Mahesh Yadav
2. Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 32 years, son of Saryu Yadav
3. Mukesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 36 years, son of Bhuneshwar Yadav, All are residents of village – Hathuwadharan, Jarga, PO – Gujhandhi, PS – Jhumri Telaiya, District - Koderma
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mrs. Pinki Kumari, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Advocate
---- 02/21.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.62 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 272, 274, 275, 292 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 47(a)(f) of Jharkhand Excise Act pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the name of the petitioners has come only on suspicion. She further submits that even the alleged mahuwa liquor has been recovered from the house of Sunil Yadav and Ramu Yadav. She then submits that so far these petitioners are concerned that allegation is not against them. She next 2026:JHHC:28496
--2-- submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.15 of the petition. On these grounds, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioners has come only on suspicion.
5. Considering that the name of the petitioners has come only on suspicion and the said mahuwa liquor has been recovered from the house of Sunil Yadav and Ramu Yadav and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.15 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.62 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.09.2026 Sangam/