A.B.A./5225/2026 of MD KAMRUL JAMAN ALIAS KAMRUL SHEKH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026

1. Md. Kamrul Jaman @ Kamrul shekh, aged about 43 years S/o-Salam Sheikh @ Abdul sheikh

2. Jakir Shekh @ Jakir Hussain, aged about 48 years, S/o- Keraul Sheikh

3. Md. Shakir @ Sakir Shekh, aged about 37 years S/o- Jalal Shekh @ Jalaluddin Shekh

4. Samirul Shekh, aged about 39 years, S/o-Sahjahan Shekh

5. Saddam Shekh @ Saddam Hussain, aged about 33 years S/o-Namdar Shekh

6. Jalarudin Shekh, aged about 54 years, S/o- Ishriyal Shekh

7. Koushar Shekh, aged about 41 years, S/o- Tufijul Shekh

8. Safikul Shekh, aged about 47 years, S/o- Ataur Shekh

9. Ajfarul Shekh, aged about 35 years, S/o- Johar Shekh

10. Jala Shekh @ Jalaluddin Shekh, aged about 31 years S/o-Ektali Shekh

11. Rajjak Shekh @Rejak Shekh aged about 36 years S/o-Jalaluddin Shekh

12. Jiyaul @ Jiyaul Shekh, aged about 37 years, S/o- Hajrat Shekh

13. Memul Shekh @ Mainul Shekh, aged about 42 years S/o-Akmuddin Shekh

14. Samim Akhtar @ Babun Shekh, aged about 42 years S/o-Hajrat Shekh @ Hajrat Ali

15. Iman Hussain @ Emam Hussain, aged about 38 years, S/o-Hajarat Ali

16. Dilwar Hussain @ Delwar Hussain, aged about 35 years, S/o Hazarat Ali

17. Jamal Shekh @ Jamirul Islam, aged about 25 years, S/o-Hazarat Ali

18. Kader Shekh @ Kadir Shekh, aged about 47 years, S/o-Johur Sheikh

19. Md. Yusuf Ali @ Mithu Shekh, aged about 35 years S/o- Hafijul Shekh @ Md. Haffijuddin

20. Md. Shakir @ Shakir Sheikh, aged about 42 years S/o- Jhuru Hazi @ Meraj shekh

21. Abu Bakkar @ Bakkar shekh, aged about 41 years, S/o-Kader Shekh

22. Tanvir Shekh @ Najmi Alam, aged about 25 years, S/o- Manjur Shekh

23. Mostak Shekh @ Mustak shekh, aged about 33 years S/o- Late Harej Shekh

24. Khabir Shekh @ Bidu Shekh, aged about 32 yearsS/o- Abdul Addud All Resident of Village- Taranager, P.O and P.S Pakur (Muffasil) District Pakur, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioners

Versus The State of Jharkhand

.... .... .... Opposite Party

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P.

------

02/21.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 158 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 49, 191(2), 191(3), 190, 195(1), 192, 196(2), 292, 293, 298, 109, 2026:JHHC:28529 299, 115(2), 117(2), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 303(2), 324(1), 324(2), 324(5) and 352 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that although the petitioners are named in the FIR, however, the FIR is registered against 40 known and 300 unknown persons. He submits that the allegations are made of indulging in vandalism and instigating the others and pursuant to that the scuffle took place between two communities. He then submits that the petitioners are not the villagers of that village where the alleged occurrence is said to be occurred. He next submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of indulging in vandalism and in view of that prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners may kindly be rejected.

5. Considering that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition and there are general and omnibus allegation against 40 known and 300 unknown persons and further two of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.4147 of 2025 and A.B.A. No.7051 of 2025, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 158 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

Dated 21.09.2026 Anit

Uploaded 24.09.2026