Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5238/2026 of SHANKAR SAW ALIAS SHANKAR PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
No. 5238 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5238 of 2026 ---- Shankar Saw @ Shankar Prasad, aged about 40 years, son of Late Bhuneshwar Saw, resident of village – Tajpur, PO and PS – Chauparan, District - Hazaribag .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28522
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5238 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5238 of 2026
---- Shankar Saw @ Shankar Prasad, aged about 40 years, son of Late Bhuneshwar Saw, resident of village – Tajpur, PO and PS – Chauparan, District - Hazaribag
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Fahad Allam, Advocate
---- 02/21.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No.413 of 2020, for the alleged offences registered under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, Section 63 of Copy Right Act and Sections 103 and 104 of Trade Mark Act pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Hazaribag.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner of selling Noor brand 7 duplicate sewing machines and two stands kept in the shop of the petitioner for selling. He further submits that the petitioner has purchased the said machine and stand from the dealer of said company and he is not knowing whether that was duplicate or not. He then submits that now charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioner has cooperated in the investigation. On these grounds, he 2026:JHHC:28522
--2-- submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of keeping duplicate ‘Noor’ brand sewing machine in the shop which was meant for selling to the customer.
5. Considering that the charge-sheet has been submitted and it appears that the petitioner has cooperated in the investigation and whether the said machine and stand are duplicate or not that is the subject matter of trial, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Hazaribag in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No.413 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.09.2026 Sangam/