Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5220/2026 of KALAM ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5220 of 2026 ------ Kalam Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Islam Ansari, resident of Raga, Kendua, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:28502 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5220 of 2026
------ Kalam Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Islam Ansari, resident of Raga, Kendua, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
------
02/21.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saraiyahat P.S. Case No.75 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of Juman Ansari and the allegations are made against Juman Ansari of firing and pursuant to that injury has been received by the husband of the informant. He submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and there are land dispute and in view of that the petitioner has been falsely implicated.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the brother-in-law of Juman Ansari.
5. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that the allegation of firing is there against Juman Ansari and the petitioner is said to be the brother-in- law of Juman Ansari and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and it has been pointed out that due to the land dispute, the said occurrence has taken place, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of 2026:JHHC:28502 his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka, in connection with Saraiyahat P.S. Case No.75 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated 21.09.2026 Anit
Uploaded 28.09.2026