Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5211/2026 of ADITYA KUMAR @ ADITYA YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A . B. A . No. 5211 of 2026 Aditya Kumar @ Aditya Yadav, aged about 20 years, son of Ajay Yadav, resident of Bhuli C-Block, Bankmore, P.S. Bhuli, O.P., P.O. Bhulinagar, District- Dhanbad ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:28485 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5211 of 2026
Aditya Kumar @ Aditya Yadav, aged about 20 years, son of Ajay Yadav, resident of Bhuli C-Block, Bankmore, P.S. Bhuli, O.P., P.O. Bhulinagar, District- Dhanbad ...... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P.
02/ 21.09.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bankmore (Bhuli O.P.) P.S. Case No.39 of 2026, for offence registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was only standing nearby and allegation of assault is against Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Yadav and he has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No. 4863 of 2026. He next submits that the alleged occurrence is said to be dated 01.03.2026 whereas the FIR has been lodged on 05.03.2026, that is, after delay of 4 days. He next submits that the allegations are made against 5-10 unknown persons, however, the petitioner is named in the FIR. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 14 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner.
4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegations are there and pursuant to assault grievous injury has been received by the injured.
5. Considering that allegation of assault is against Gautam Kumar @
( 2026:JHHC:28485 )
Gautam Yadav and he has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No. 4863 of 2026 and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 14 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner.
6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Bankmore (Bhuli O.P.) P.S. Case No.39 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
Dt.21.09.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-