Jharkhand High Court
W.P.(Cr.)/483/2026 of YASHMATIYA DEVI YASHMATIYA KUVAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.)(HB)(DB) No. 483 of 2026 ------ Yashmatiya Devi @ Yashmatiya Kunwar, Aged About – 43 yrs W/O- Late Suryadev Paswan @ Surajdev Ram,Vill-Khalsa Bariatu, P/O & P/S Latehar Jharkhand. ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State
2026:JHHC:28637-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.)(HB)(DB) No. 483 of 2026
------
Yashmatiya Devi @ Yashmatiya Kunwar, Aged About – 43 yrs W/O- Late Suryadev Paswan @ Surajdev Ram,Vill-Khalsa Bariatu, P/O & P/S
Latehar Jharkhand.
... Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Superintendent of Police, Latehar, Office at Latehar SP office, P/O, P/S – Latehar, Dist. – Latehar Jharkhand.
3. Officer In-charge Latehar Police Station, P/O. and P/s – Latehar, District Latehar Jharkhand
4. Investigation officer, Latehar Police Station, P.O. and P.S. – Latehar District Latehar Jharkhand.
5. Laxmi Kumari D/O Bishundev Paswan, R/O Bandhuwa, P/O Palheya & P/S manika, Dist – Latehar, Jharkhand.
6. Bishundev Paswan, S/O Mahavir Manjhi R/O Bandhuwa, P/O Palheya & P/S manika, Dist – Latehar, Jharkhand.
7. Pramila Devi, W/O – Bishundev Paswan R/O Bandhuwa, P/O Palheya & P/S manika, Dist – Latehar, Jharkhand.
... Respondents/Opposite Parties
CORAM
: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Appellant : Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG
------
05/Dated: 21st September, 2026
1. The instant writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus commanding upon the respondents to find out and bring the body of Chotu Kumar Paswan, the son of the petitioner.
2. The case was heard by this Court on 18.08.2026, and on that date,
2026:JHHC:28637-DB
the State was directed to file counter affidavit. The same has been filed.
3. The corpus is present in the Court and has stated that he has solemnized the marriage with one Laxmi Kumari D/O Bishundev Paswan and is now living his marital life with her in Navi Mumbai.
4. Mr. Shadab Eqbal, learned counsel for the petitioner, based upon the fact that the corpus is present, has submitted that he is not pressing the instant writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition being W.P.(Cr.)(HB)(DB) No. 483 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed, and as such, disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
21st September, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on 26.09.2026