Jharkhand High Court

A.B.A./5234/2026 of ROHINI DEVI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 5234 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5234 of 2026 ---- Rohini Devi, aged about 51 years, W/o Prabhat Mahto @ Prabhat Kumar Mahto, R/o village – Oraondih, Rahe, PO – Rahe, PS – Rahe, District - Ranchi .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:JHHC:28501

--1-- A.B.A. No. 5234 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 5234 of 2026

---- Rohini Devi, aged about 51 years, W/o Prabhat Mahto @ Prabhat Kumar Mahto, R/o village – Oraondih, Rahe, PO – Rahe, PS – Rahe, District - Ranchi .... Petitioner -- Versus --

The State of Jharkhand

.... Opposite Party

---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

---

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rajan Sahay, Advocate

:- Mrs. Nanda Kumari, Advocate

For the State

:- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate

---- 03/21.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rahe P.S. Case No.9 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M., Ranchi.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady and false allegations are made against the petitioner that she held the informant and thereafter assault made by the husband of the petitioner by axe. He further submits that even the injury report is not there. He then submits that the petitioner is a housewife and has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition. On these grounds, he 2026:JHHC:28501

--2-- submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of assault.

5. Considering that the petitioner is a lady, however, the allegations are made of get hold the informant and thereafter the assault has been made by the husband of the petitioner by axe and in the course of argument it has been pointed out that the husband of the petitioner is already in custody and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi in connection with Rahe P.S. Case No.9 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.09.2026 Sangam/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead