Jharkhand High Court
WPC/2387/2014 of PRAFULL KUMAR JHA Vs REVENUE DEPARTMENT on 21 September 2026
--1-- W.P. (C.) No. 2387 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P. (C.) No. 2387 of 2014 ---- Prafull Kumar Jha, son of Late Anandi Prasad Jha, resident of Renu Sadan Gangta Khurd, Opp. D.C. Residence, Godda, PO and PS – Godda, District - Godda .... Petitioner -- Versus --
2026:JHHC:28469
--1--
W.P. (C.) No. 2387 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Prafull Kumar Jha, son of Late Anandi Prasad Jha, resident of Renu Sadan Gangta Khurd, Opp. D.C. Residence, Godda, PO
and PS – Godda, District - Godda
.... Petitioner
-- Versus --
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Revenue Department Project Building, PO – Dhurwa, PS – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda, PO and PS – Godda, District – Godda
3. The Dy. Collector Land Reforms, Godda, PO and PS – Godda, District – Godda
4. The Circle Officer, Godda, PO and PS – Godda, District – Godda
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Aishwarya Prakash, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate
:- Mr. Anshuman Kumar, Advocate
---- 09/21.09.2026 This matter is of the year 2014.
2. The matter relates to different proceedings relating to Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act arising out of R.E.R. Case No.36/2012- 13/148/2001-02.
3. Mr. Aishwarya Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in spite of his best efforts he has not been able to take instruction and in view of that he is not in a position to argue the matter.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that this 2026:JHHC:28469
--2-- matter is of the year 2014 and in view of the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner it appears that the petitioner has lost the interest in the matter and that is why he has not given any instruction to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
5. In view of the above submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is hereby dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.09.2026 Sangam/